![]() |
Project Abstract |
|||
|
Client: Huls America, Inc., Piscataway, NJ Contact: Mr.
Michael Catalfano Project: Design/Build
Office and Background –
The facility consisted of four major buildings and a power plant housing boilers
and chillers. The boilers, chillers
and cooling tower were over 30 years old. The
major consumer of high-pressure steam was a manufacturing facility, which was
sold to another company five years prior. Intent
– The client asked BUIST to investigate the possibility of eliminating the
boiler plant and installing a more economical chiller plant in the office and
R&D facility. Such installation
would eliminate the need for “around-the-clock” stationary engineering
boiler supervision, and would allow substantial energy savings as a result of
the smaller boilers and more efficient chillers.
Details
–
1) Space was created for the new chillers by adding a mezzanine in a high bay
area; the area below was to be used for laboratories. 2) Two-stage, gas-fired
absorption chillers were used to reduce the peak summertime energy use.
The chillers were rigged into the building through openings in the roof,
and the cooling towers were installed on the roof above the chillers.
4) The steam systems were separated into under 100 HP
low-pressure steam systems, and cast iron, sectional, gas-fired boilers were
installed in the various buildings to replace the high-pressure steam system.
5) The existing steam piping from the power plant to the main building
was converted for use for the gas distribution piping to the new chillers.
6) The existing chilled water zone pumps in those two buildings were
changed to variable frequency drive pumps, and were de-coupled from the new
chiller primary pumps to save energy. 7)
The changeover from the old heating system to the new was accomplished by
separately divorcing sections of the steam system, one at a time, and connecting
each to a respective boiler. 8) The chiller changeover was accomplished by waiting until
all steam systems were changed over, and the air conditioning season was over.
8) The project cost was $2.56 million Results
– 1) The project was completed on time and within budget.
2) The project resulted in energy savings much greater than anticipated.
3) The comfort of the occupants was greatly improved. 4) The client’s
project manager, busy with other international projects, appreciated BUIST’s
project management capabilities. 5) Permission to speak with the client may be
arranged upon request, or BUIST’s
letter of reference may be reviewed. _____________________________________________________________ Buist's
Services
|
||||
|
PLG Lic #6644
Engr. Design by M.P.
Freund & Assoc
|
||||
| Copyright ©
2000 Buist Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. Revised: 08/17/2001 |
||||